The Byte Show

Human BioAcousticsTM, Bio-terrorism and Vaccination
An Interview with Sharry Edwards


ã 2003 The Byte Show, posted with permission.

Sound Health Research Institute, Inc.


Editors note: The interview was cybercast on the Internet at on January 24, 2003. This transcript is an informal discussion between individuals -- a spoken exchange in which thoughts, opinions, and feelings are expressed. It is comprised of sentence fragments and may include unusual terminology as the participants endeavor to articulate their unique experiences and knowledge.  It has been edited as necessary, omitting parts where the questions were repeated, or words were spelled out.  Guest hosts were Ralph and Kathy Fucetola,  The show is available over the Internet through C-Band Talk Network,  Edited by Tommy Priakos


Mr. Fucetola:  Good evening, this is Ralph and Kathy Fucetola — standing in for GeorgeAnn Hughes on The Byte Show, cybercast every Friday, midnight Eastern Standard Time.  We’re also broadcast on satellite. Please check the show website at for details.


Tonight’s guest is Sharry Edwards, scientist, innovator, and teacher. Her topic is Human BioAcousticsTM, bio-terrorism and vaccination. Ms. Edwards will discuss new BioAcousticsTM approaches to evaluating adverse reaction risks from vaccination and the lessons learned from vocal analysis of people who survived 9/11.


Sharry Edwards is the leading innovator in the emerging science of Human Bioacoustics.  Ms. Edwards was named New Scientist of the Year in 2001, and received, along with Dr. John Forbes Nash and others, the 2002 O. Spurgeon English Humanitarian Award. Reports on these awards are at the Sound Health Research website,


On to our show tonight with our very special guest, Sharry Edwards: Her website is, or just link to her at the Byte show website, “Guests” section. [Ed. note: Please scroll down to 24 January 2003]


Sharry, hello, and how are you?


Ms. Edwards:  Hi Ralph! Hi Kathy!


Ms. Fucetola: Hi Sharry! I want to say something here: Ralph and I have spent decades looking at energy alternatives, because, after all, we know that the human and everything else is nothing but energy, and often when I discuss BioAcousticsTM with people —when it’s brought up—people say, “Well, have you seen the work of Royal Rife?” And I say, ‘Yes, the man was a genius. Too bad he only worked with pathogens, Sharry is working with the whole human body and everything it can do,” and I absolutely believe that if Royal Rife were alive today, he would be working with Sharry, because I think that Sharry has gone further than anyone to decipher and study, and analyze, and figure out how these energies work.


Mr. Fucetola:  I have to second that, myself, absolutely!


Sharry do you want to start off by telling us a little bit about the type of research that people in BioAcousticsTM have been doing over the past year and a half since the tragic events of 9/11 and the Anthrax scare afterwards?


Ms. Edwards:  Well, we probably should start off with what’s BioAcousticsTM, and how we do it.  There are actually two types of Bioacoustics: one is the field of working with animals, in which the scientists study dolphin whistles and whale calls, and frog croaks and bird whistles, and they can tell about that animal’s environment, both externally and internally. When a bird’s song is off, they know they’re ill, when a frog’s croak is not quite right, they know that that frog is ill.  We do the same thing with humans. We take a 44-second computerized sample of the human voice and we can look at nutrient needs, the genes, toxins - like you’re talking about, and we got heavily involved in looking at toxins when the World Trade Center went down. We were working with some of the scientists that were in the hole, just to see what we could find by way of the toxins, because they were in there with all of these chemicals. So we took their vocal prints, computerized it, then did a comparison, and found out that one of the flame retardants, Mirex, was the one responsible for the fireman’s cough. And we went back and worked with the firemen’s union and were able to verify more of this and how we’ve been looking at Mirex and its effects long-term as a toxin; and it’s associated with breast cancer. So we’re really anxious to go back and work more with the union. We need the grant funds to get that put together.  We’re working on all aspects of it; I’m decoding more of their vocal prints and seeing what’s in each one of them, because we can tell what your nutrition is, what amino acids and vitamins you need to take each day, we can tell genetic tendencies, what diseases you’re going to have, we can look at what you’ve been exposed to in your environment. Of special interest to me is not only those kinds of toxins that come from disasters like that, or pollutants in the air, or all of these chemtrails that are going on, but I’m also investigating, heavily, the toxins right now that are in vaccinations, not only as the virus, because we can handle that with frequency, because BioAcousticsTM has two aspects: not only can we look at the vocal print and do some pre-diagnostic management, but we can give you back low frequency sound, and actually support normal structure and function in the body.  So that’s a pretty nutshell background of who and what we are.


Ralph and I have known each other for a while, and one of the things that we did with you that you might want to talk about is how we handled a certain virus that you had, just using low frequency analog presentation. So Ralph can you talk about the virus that we helped you get rid of so people could understand this from a client’s perspective?


Mr. Fucetola:  That would be very interesting. Kathy is a BioAcoustic researcher, and of course, we research on ourselves and recently— 


Ms. Fucetola:  We’re our own best subjects!


Mr. Fucetola:  Right! (chuckles) —and recently I had some gastric distress…


Ms. Fucetola:  Yeah, Ralph woke up about two o’clock in the morning, waking us all up, and making quite a noise and quite a mess, and he was throwing up rather violently every twenty or thirty minutes. I thought, “Well, this is going to pass over, and by morning he’ll be fine, he’ll just be a little tired and he won’t go to work.” But by morning he was still doing it, he was still throwing up, and he couldn’t hold anything down. So we took a voice print and we found a frequency that appeared, according to our research, to be a virus, or a pathogen of some sort. And I did the proper work with it as taught by Sharry, and eight minutes later Ralph was completely better. He not only no longer threw up, but his temperature went away, his clamminess stopped, he was finally comfortable enough to lay down and go to sleep—he had been in a lot of pain and couldn’t get comfortable—and he was stunned by this, he couldn’t believe that it could just have disappeared like that. But everything is energy, and when you affect energy the way it should be affected, those are the results.


Mr. Fucetola:  Actually, I wouldn’t say that I couldn’t believe, Kathy; to a great, great extent, we’ve been studying energies for a long time, and I believe the effectiveness that those energies work—


Ms. Fucetola:  Yeah, absolutely, you believe it, but when it happens to you—


Mr. Fucetola:  Right, it’s always astounding…


Ms. Fucetola:  —you looked so startled at the time—like, “OH, WOW!” And then he went to sleep, and he did take the day off, but he didn’t throw up any more and he was fine after that.


Mr. Fucetola:  Exactly. Now, you know, not every intervention works that quickly, but it’s certainly enlightening when it does work that quickly. Kathy wasn’t the Frequency EquivalentTM of that particular frequency Salmonella?


Ms. Fucetola:  I’m sorry; I would have to look that up in the file, I don’t believe it was.


Mr. Fucetola:  Right, okay, so Sharry that’s an example of our experience in that area.


Ms. Edwards:  One of the things that Sir Arthur C. Clarke  has said is that “A sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” (his Third Law). And when most people hear about Human BioAcoustics, they think it’s magic. We’ve kept it in the research realm; we’re just now venturing out to people. The word’s getting out—we’re not really advertising or anything—but the word is getting out to people, and most of us who are in the field have had a personal experience like that.  My interest in autism is because I have a grand daughter that’s autistic. We did her vocal print when she was quite young, about three years of age, and we found out that she was highly allergic to milk protein, called Casein. And we took her off the milk protein and now she’s a recovering autistic!


Mr. Fucetola:  Right, I think there’s a great deal of value in the evaluation side of BioAcousticsTM.


Sharry could you explain to the audience a little bit about the process of BioAcousticsTM and how one goes about getting a voice print and looking at it?


Ms. Edwards:  Well, there are practitioners all over the world; there’s about 3,000 trained practitioners, and they can go to our website if they want to see somebody near them, or they want to get involved in this new research program we’re doing called PreVacä. We’re doing pre-screening for people who are fearful about the smallpox stuff that’s coming up, and we’ve been able in the pilot studies—


Mr. Fucetola:  Yeah, Sharry, talking about smallpox—if I can interrupt for a second—I heard this evening on National Public Radio that smallpox was responsible for killing half a billion people during the first half of the twentieth century, about twice as many people as have died in all the wars and massacres of the 20th century combined, and so the possible return of smallpox is something that everyone is concerned about. Of course, we always want to keep a positive attitude and not give into the hysteria of the moment, but we’re happy to know there are new technologies coming around that can help people.


I’m sorry, go ahead…


Ms. Edwards:  Do you think that’s a scare tactic: all this stuff that they’re saying about terrorism and smallpox, and Ricin, just so that they can pass some laws or scare people into taking these shots?


Ms. Fucetola:  Oh, yes, I do, absolutely. In fact, I suspect that if there is an outbreak of smallpox it will be because some people get the shot, and then, because of contact with other people while that shot is alive in them, that that will be the spread of smallpox. I do think it’s a scare tactic at this point because we see that the government is so desperate for this was war—this oil war—that they are using any tactic they can to scare people about terrorism, etc.


Ms. Edwards:  Even though we can pre-screen people for something like a virus or a bacteria, we’ve been able to handle that also, so we have a two-fold program to help people. And how they get in touch with us is usually by word of mouth, or they’ve heard me speak someplace, or their doctor will refer them to us. We do a 44-second sample of their voice on a computer and we translate that vocal data into numeric data so that we can look at every frequency in the voice. And we look at the architecture, how the voice is actually structured—


§         Is this a high peak that’s hollow? That probably would be a toxin Frequency EquivalentTM

§         Is it a high peak that is very narrow? That’s probably a pathogen Frequency EquivalentTM

§         Is it a narrow peak that’s filled in? That’s probably the Frequency EquivalentTM of a pathogen that’s getting taken care of by the body

§         Is it just one little spike high on the chart? That might be the Frequency EquivalentTM of something they can’t use.


For instance, a lot of ADD kids have adrenalin in stress, and we can give them the frequency that’s indicated, and—and we actually have this on film—and we can give an ADD kid the frequency for adrenalin and watch them calm right down, and just sit in a chair and read and—


Ms. Fucetola:  Yes, their body will start to use it instead of just store it. When they have a high in adrenalin, you expect them to behave a certain way, and if they’re not, sometimes the high, as we’ve learned in class, isn’t actually that they have a lot; it’s that they have a lot that they’re not using correctly. Sometimes you have to give a person more of something in order to get them to use it properly


Ms. Edwards:  Well, I’ve given adults the Frequency EquivalentTM of adrenaline with sound, and you can watch the adrenaline rise, and they’ll go to sleep! 


Ms. Fucetola:  Wow!


Ms. Edwards:  You know, instead of this fidgety-fidgety person, they’re calm, and then they’ll end up fighting you over the little tone box we use, because they like carrying it around with them.


(All laugh)


Mr. Fucetola:  Right! There’s been occasions when we’ve had people fighting over tone boxes, yes!


I think, Sharry, we mentioned at the beginning the awards you’ve been given in recent years, and I know you are far too humble to want to talk about them, so I’m not going to ask you about them, but I thought I would tell our audience a little bit about the one award that we saw you receive at Temple University on October 5th 2002, and that was the O. Spurgeon English Humanitarian Award.   Dr. English was the head of Psychiatry at Temple University for 35 years, and these awards were created in his memory. The honorees—this group that you were in—were so astounding that it was something I wanted to talk about, because these are people who—almost all of them—have been very active in the alternative wellness world who are giants in their own field.


Ms. Fucetola:  Very cutting edge…


Mr. Fucetola:  Very cutting edge people, and to see you in this wonderful list made us very happy, and I just thought we’d let people know who was on that list. There were a dozen people in the room that night receiving this award, and all of them had MDs and PhDs after their names, and they all were from places like Georgetown University, and they were individuals like Dr. Doris Rapp, like Oscar Rasmussen, like Dr. V.K. Singh, and other very well known individuals in the alternative field. Even John Forbes Nash, the Nobel Laureate, was one of the recipients of the award, and these awards are basically granted to people, physicians, and scientists who’ve made major humanitarian contributions to human welfare—that’s how the organization describes it.  And it was wonderful to see you receive that award.


Ms. Fucetola:  Oh, it was very thrilling!


Ms. Edwards:  Aww. Thank you!


Ms. Fucetola:  A wonderful evening!


Mr. Fucetola:  Yes. And if they want to take a look at some pictures from that evening and other things they can go to the Sound Health Research Organization Website and look at some photos and some descriptions.


Ms. Edwards:  One of the things I wanted to add to this was that the O. Spurgeon award was for pioneering in medicine, and to be able to do a vocal print and look at your entire body, including what you have been exposed to, and what you’re breathing, and what your genetics are; I think that’s very pioneering in medicine today, because—


Ms. Fucetola:  Yes, that’s what I was just about to get into with the World Trade Center problems, because these people were exposed to so many toxins and so many poisons, and so many of them are still sick, and many doctors haven’t been able to figure out what was wrong with them, and Sharry and Jen, another associate, went into New York and started working on these people, and I’ll let Sharry tell what happened, but before she does, I want to mention a case I did about four years ago:  a woman came to me from Switzerland, and her fingernails were cracking, and her hair was falling out. She was probably in her mid-thirties, and she was a very beautiful woman, and no one could figure out what was wrong with her. And I did a voice test, and lo and behold, there was a high in her voice that was off the chart, and it related to a fluke medication—now, flukes are a parasite, they get into various parts of the body—and this was a medication, a toxin that had been used by her to kill flukes in her intestines, or her liver, or wherever. And she had not told me about this, because it had happened a while before and she hadn’t thought of it, but she was very, very ill, and when I looked at her and asked “Have you ever used this medication?”  Her response was, “Oh wow! You can tell that from my voice?!”  She said, “Yes, I did!” and I said, “When did you use it?” And she said, “About four months before my hair started to fall out!” There you go! There was the answer!


Ms. Edwards:  It absolutely works. Even while we were doing some of the firemen, one of them came in to have his vocal print done, and he was in the midst of a gall bladder attack, and we were helping him through that. So they were pretty amazed by what was going on; what’s stopping us mainly though, is just the money to get all of the research done. So, from the World Trade Center and what we did there, we got invited to do other things with the government and other organizations. One of the things I recently did was decode Ricin. Have you heard about that in the news recently? It’s the castor bean poison that they found in a London apartment, and it doesn’t have any antidote what so ever. And I decoded that into frequency with its antidote, and sent it on to the FDA. So one of the things that everyone is concerned with is not only the toxins that would come from something like the World Trade Center, but also these deliberate bio-terrorism attempts, such as Anthrax, and Ricin, and whatever else they think is going to be thrown at us.

     We could put in government buildings or large public buildings, a way for them to monitor people’s voices in that building, and we can look at things like Anthrax, when they’re still in a gene stage and when they’re not pathogenic and would be a problem to the body. It’s like being exposed to a cold, it’s a few days before you get it, and we have found a way to look at Anthrax and other bio-terrorist resistant pathogens in their genome state. They must mix with your proteins before they become pathogenic. This is also what’s happening with the vaccinations, when they give kids vaccinations that contain methyl mercury they’re actually activating genes, and one of the things that activates is an autism gene! And we’ve been able to crack that code too. So being able to use the program to find out who’s going to have a problem, or who’s going to have a disease, and then going back and helping them through it, just like the little girl—


Mr. Fucetola:  So this is basically a pre-screening program?


Ms. Edwards:  Absolutely! It’s called PreVacTM. So anybody that is interested in knowing, or having us take a vocal print to see if we can tell if they would have any problems with a vaccination, they should get in touch with us.


Mr. Fucetola:  How far from being available to the public is this research, at this time?


Ms. Edwards:  Just days, we’re just now putting the final touches on the database. People sent us a few more pieces of data that they thought might need to go in it. One of the things that we learned was that the Frequency EquivalentTM of Candida was a very important part of autism, and a lot of these other diseases because of these vaccinations, and what’s going on with them, disturbed the gut, so we had to go back and decode something that’s called the g-alpha genes, and to decode a gene takes quite a while, and that these genes are often upset in anyone that has autism, because they upset the ability to use Vitamin A and to help the body fight. So we’re just putting the finishing touches on that. We actually released this last weekend at an autism conference in Pittsburgh.


Mr. Fucetola:  Gee, it seems to me, Sharry, that this same principle that you’re using in the PreVac program can probably be applied not just to the risks of vaccination, but also to the risks of other medication.  One of the biggest problems we have in this country today is that properly prescribed medications cause over a 150,000 deaths a year, and the pharmaceutical industry would be very happy to find a non-invasive method of evaluating people in advance, to find out if they would be susceptible to side-effects.


Ms. Edwards:  Absolutely!


Mr. Fucetola:  And I would hope that that becomes a real possibility!


Ms. Edwards:  We can do that already to tell if there’s going to be side effects, even a new medication that’s not been tested, we can look at its molecular structure and its Frequency EquivalentsTM and tell if there may be side effects, and we can tell who may have the most side effects. One of the things we do now, referrals for doctors, is to be able to match people up with their high blood pressure medication—there’s several, and they just try them till they get one right—well, we can match it up, and we can match up insulin with the person. And sometimes it’s not what the doctor even knows. We had a referral from a Chicago doctor to see what kind of insulin to put a man on, and when our vocal print came back and we looked at it, we said, “This guy doesn’t have diabetes, he has a low grade infection in the pancreas.”  So we had the doctor check for that; sure enough, that’s what it was! But he might have gone years with all these different kinds of insulin that would have caused problems in his body and we were able to stop it before it became a bigger problem.


Mr. Fucetola:  I see!


Ms. Fucetola:  Yeah, one of the things you find when you go out to Ohio and work with Sharry is that miracles seem to be more commonplace there than they are in other places, and I’ve spent many of my classes weeping my way through them, because what I saw was so beautiful. Sharry seems to find the unusual, the odd way of looking at something, and she manages because of all those numbers, and the way she sees them, to get to root cause and get down to the basics faster than any other alternative that I’ve seen.


Mr. Fucetola: Well, in a sense it’s only natural since we know that every thing is frequency and vibration, — 


Ms. Fucetola:  Everything is energy! Exactly! And the frequency defines it, they define the energy.


Mr. Fucetola: —and energy effects energy. Right. There seems to me, Sharry, two basic elements or aspects to BioAcousticsTM: one of those is the evaluation end, where you’re looking at the human voice spectral analysis, and the other is the application end where you’re presenting low frequency to the person’s environment. Do you find that the evaluation end is being more readily accepted by the medical community than the presentation end?


Ms. Edwards:  Well, yes, once they find out about the evaluation end—because we teach a two-day class for doctors, and I am on the faculty at Capital University’s Integrative Medicine program in Washington, and we go there and we teach medical professionals to do this, and once they find out what it is, then they come to our laboratory in Ohio and they take the longer course to be able to look at sound presentation. One of the most exciting things we’ve done is to decode Paget’s disease, and find out exactly what molybdenum, what type, and what Copper and Calcium is doing in the body, and to be able to reverse a supposedly incurable disease, and to show the doctors the results—That’s pretty astounding, when they can actually talk to a patient and see that, okay, they have Paget’s disease here, which is a form of Calcium moving around in the body where it shouldn’t be. And when the patient has Paget’s and six weeks later doesn’t, that’s pretty much the miracle. This is kind of like Star Trek medication, with that little tricorder thing they do.


Mr. Fucetola:  Well, you know, there’s been a real sea change in the attitude of the medical community towards alternatives over the past couple of years, and even the AMA code of ethics in recent years has been amended to specifically recognize the relationship between the physicians and alternative practitioners, and it now allows physicians to refer to what they call other physicians, of course, persons of limited license and other health care providers, whose therapies may be of benefit to the patient, and this new “of benefit” standard is different than the old treatment of disease standard and it allows a much greater flexibility among doctors in reaching out toward the new sciences that are developing. You said before that any science that’s sufficiently advanced looks like magic, another thing that we all understand in the way science works is that it takes a generation for new ideas to percolate down, and certainly, the ideas that you’ve been expressing are new ideas, and they are percolating down, and they’re becoming recognized, as we’ve seen by the awards you’ve received recently, and as we’ve seen by the way that your work in the area of bio-toxins has been taken very seriously.


(Mr. Fucetola does the half-time break – sponsor: - Research Power Tools.)


Mr. Fucetola:  Our guest this evening is Sharry Edwards, innovator of Human BioAcousticsTM, and we’ve been discussing bio-toxins and the use of BioAcoustic EvaluationTM in that area. Before the break, we were beginning to get in to the discussion that we were going to have regarding vaccination and the role that BioAcousticsTM can have in dealing with some of the problems in that area, and that’s what we’d like to start to focus on the last part of our program, so I’d like to introduce again Sharry Edwards.


Hello, Sharry, are you there?


Ms. Edwards:  I’m here, Ralph, I was waiting for you to drop off and have a break, but you did the commercial, you did great!


Ms. Fucetola:  That was the break!


Mr. Fucetola:  That was the break!!  That’s it. (Laughs)


Ms. Edwards:  So we could talk about the body being a math matrix and how everything fits together, and then go ahead and talk about, maybe, methyl mercury, and how that affects vaccinations and causes them to be very toxic to some people. How does that sound?


Ms. Fucetola:  That sounds fine!


Mr. Fucetola:  Sounds really good! Yeah.


Ms. Edwards:  Well, in looking at the body, every muscle has a frequency, every compound in your body has a frequency, like your stomach acid has a frequency, and your brain fluid has a frequency, and your tears have a frequency, and your stomach has a frequency. Well, we’ve been able to decode what those frequencies are, and then through entrainment, through giving your brain a signal, we’ve been able to use, or develop, a form of biofeedback that we can cause your muscles to be weak or strong, we can cause the ‘go to sleep’ chemical to drop into your system, all using low-frequency analog sound. Now, we use analog because that’s what the brain is; the body perceives and heals itself in analog fashion. I want to caution people from using CDs for healing, especially low frequency CDs, because that is digital. Now, it’s great to kill bugs, it’s great to make plants grow, but it’s not particularly good for human beings. As we begin to use the low frequency sound with people, it affects the brain waves, which in turn affects this energy pattern all over the body. I’ll give you an example: in each joint that you have, you have fluid, and part of that fluid is a substance called Hyaluronic Acid. The body makes Hyaluronic Acid from Vitamin A and Proline, an amino acid. It mixes them together in such a way that it creates fluid, and the innate intelligence of the body then sends that fluid to the joints for it to lubricate. Well, if you take the frequency of Vitamin A and the frequency of Proline and you add them together, it gives you the frequency of Hyaluronic Acid. Now, I didn’t make up these frequencies and all these rules, this is based on standard—


Ms. Fucetola:  Yeah, it’s when you see the frequency relationships between bone and Magnesium and Calcium, and the Hyaluronic Acid, that you see the God work in this. It’s just wonderful the way everything meshes!


Ms. Edwards:  Well, people don’t really like to think that we are just math, because that gives them the indication that we’re kind of like robots, and I said that once in a speech, I think I was New York, and a lady got up and smacked me with a broom! (Chuckles) and told me she is NOT A ROBOT!  That was about twenty years ago, so I think the world’s a little more enlightened at this point and they can see that idea that everything on the planet is a frequency. And Ralph was saying it takes about a generation for things to be accepted; we’re coming up on our thirty-year anniversary, Ralph, in 2000 and 6!  We published the first papers here in ’76! That’s really hard to believe I have committed that much of my life to this, and it just went in a blink of an eye! I mean, we’ve got a lot accomplished, but it just went!


Ms. Fucetola:  Well, you also have a couple of kids who were always getting into physical problems, accidents and the like, that really pushed all of this forward! (Laughs) I don’t know how you survived that, knowing some of those stories, but you have things thrust right in your lap, so you really had no choice but to go forward!


Ms. Edwards:  Well, if it isn’t my kids, there’s always somebody there that needs help every day. We have a great, great staff, but everyday we hit the door running, and our day never goes the way we’ve planned it, there’s always some other emergency, and somebody dying, and some kid born with incomplete lungs, and always something that we’re called to do. BioAcousticTM practitioners are busy for months ahead of time. There’s only about 3,000 of us, and that sounds like a lot, but if you think of there only being 3,000 physicians in the world you’d get the gist that there needs to be a lot more. And we don’t train everybody who applies; probably for every five people who apply, maybe we accept two people to training, because we’re very particular about whom we let into this work because it’s VERY, VERY POWERFUL. You could probably do a lot of damage to people if you weren’t trained correctly, or you’re using the wrong equipment, because there are sounds that put hearts into rhythm, and by these same sounds you could take somebody’s heart out of rhythm! So this math matrix of the body is pretty important, and it’s not something that ought to just be let loose on the public or posted on the Internet, like, “here’s how to make a bomb,” or, “here’s how to make somebody’s heart stop!” It’s pretty significant and should be in the hands of trained professionals. I wish that I knew more about everything there was to know about BioAcousticsTM, but I just don’t have enough lifetimes to get it all done! So as soon as we know everything there is to know, then we’ll probably become a science, but right now we’re a research lab and people get involved in BioAcousticsTM to become a researcher—maybe they get interested in something like vaccinations…


Ms. Fucetola:  I think it’s going to be exciting when it goes beyond the human/animal body, to other uses, to when you can perhaps travel time or dimensions with sound, or do other very unusual things with sound that aren’t really being considered now, because there’s so much to deal with in alternative health.


Ms. Edwards:  Well, we have done a few experiments with being able to distort time; that’s a fun project, but there’re more sick people out there than there are people who want to distort time! (Chuckles)


Ms. Fucetola:  Right!


Ms. Edwards:  We’re doing experiments with plants, and certainly we’ve done a lot of animals; racehorses, and very famous cats and rabbits. We’ve done those in a way that’s different from taking a computer print, but they can still be done.


I would like to take the vocal print of newborns; and like a movie that came out recently, they read some kind of scan on babies, and said, “Oh, it’s going to be this, it’s going to have this disease and blah di dah.” I think we’re not far from that, in being able to look at the frequency matrix, maybe even in utero. But you know you’re going to have some people out there, who want to take this frequency out and put that frequency in, and make their baby a genius, and make her have red hair, and whatever…This stuff just can’t be manipulated with, it’s too powerful; just like the government and other people are trying to manipulate people’s bodies with these vaccines. And Ralph, you’ve been working with some really famous doctors about vaccines and what it really does, and I see a lot of propaganda in the paper that says vaccinations don’t hurt anybody, and I just think that’s poppycock! Because I can see by the numbers that it does! One of the things that we see that Dr. Eva Snead—and I know you know her—has been trying to tell the American public for many years is that bioflavonoids can help right before vaccinations.  If you pump your kids up with bioflavonoids, which are forms of ascorbic acid, they have less feedback, and those studies have been published in France for years, and why they don’t get in to our literature is beyond me!


Ms. Fucetola:  Yes, I believe in France that the children are required to take Quercitin before they get a vaccination.


Ms. Edwards:  Which is a bioflavonoid!


Ms. Fucetola:  Yes.


Ms. Edwards:  Ralph, what do some of the doctors that you’ve worked with say are the dangers of vaccinations?  What’s this going to do to the second and third generation?  Are we all going to become vegetables because of this?


Mr. Fucetola:  (Chuckles)


Ms. Fucetola:  Well, one of the big problems that hasn’t even been dealt with yet—right now, these doctors that Ralph is working with talk about the mercury, the autism, the problem of how many vaccinations these children are getting, what they’re doing, the toxins—but one of the things they’re not talking about yet—and I think it’s very important—are the viruses they’re actually putting in your body when they give them the vaccinations and where they come from. I mean, they’re using genetic material from sick monkeys in these vaccinations! And how is that genetic material, which is relatively new—it’s only been, maybe, two generations that have been getting these vaccinations—how many generations from now are we going to start seeing, maybe, some really strange things in humans because of this material?


Ms. Edwards:  Well, Kathy, you and I, and Ralph, are all about the same age—and it’s a point my husband made today—he said, “in our generation you heard about some complications, but not that much.” Then in our kids there were more, and now in our kid’s kids it seems to be epidemic!


Mr. Fucetola:  Well, you know, Sharry, to some extent, that’s because there are so many more vaccinations being given.


Ms. Fucetola:  Yes, it’s just like antibiotics, when they came out—and granted, antibiotics are wonderful, they have their use—when they came out, they were used on a limited basis, and they worked miracles! Now they’ve been so over-used that we have all kinds of problems with them… same sort of thing!


Ms. Edwards:  Ralph, from the doctors that you’ve worked with, with these vaccinations, are they more concerned with the preservatives—the actual toxic heavy metals that are used as a preservative, methyl mercury or other things—or are they concerned with the actual virus that’s being let go to run around in the body?


Mr. Fucetola:  I think they are more concerned about the toxins than about the mutant genes that may result, yeah, very much so.


Ms. Edwards:  Well, one of the things that we’re finding now—we’ve got a rash of people with muscle deterioration, the toes and hands are all becoming cold and numb, and people can’t use them very well. It sort of looks like arthritis, but it’s really not, and we’ve traced this back to the Measles antigen! So they got these Measles shots maybe, forty years ago, and they’re just now coming back to cause a lot of damage to the peripheral parts of the body.


Mr. Fucetola:  Ahh!


Ms. Fucetola:  Interesting!


Ms. Edwards:  So if we detox this Measles from them, it seems to bring back their ability to use B12, and when you think of the autistic kids, one of the things that goes is their digestion. B12 digestion starts in the stomach, so if you’re looking at this Measles antigen for the B12 that feeds the extremities, then you’ve got the connection.


And nobody really knows what’s going to happen with these vaccinations, they’re GUESSING! With the new program that we’ve put together, we can look at your voice and tell what symptoms, what disease—is it going to be Alzheimer’s, is it going to Candida, is your connective tissue going to go? We can look at your particular voice, and we have biochemical cascades--there’s thirteen cascades for methyl mercury alone--that we can correlate with your vocal print—and we can tell if you’re going to have problematic reactions or not. And for everybody in the U.S. to be forced to take a smallpox vaccination without this preliminary testing…I just think it’s awesome to think about what we are doing to our genetics: We are allowing the government to subject every one of us to distorted genetics for generations to come!


Ms. Fucetola:  Yeah, they really don’t know what they’re doing, we’re just guinea pigs.


Mr. Fucetola:  And that, by the way, Sharry, is shown by a very important fact about vaccinations that people need to be aware of, and that is, vaccination is an uninsurable risk. Just like nuclear power plants, there’s no insurance company out there that’ll write the insurance to a pharmaceutical company for the possible damages that vaccination may cause. And as a result of that, Congress passed a law exempting the pharmaceutical companies and the physicians from any liability for injuries caused by vaccinations.


Ms. Fucetola: So if you or your kid gets damaged it’s just TOO BAD!


Mr. Fucetola: Well, there is a government “no-fault” program, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that exists to compensate people. The pharmaceutical industry does pay into that, and it pays out about $200 million a year to families of kids who’ve been damaged by vaccination. This is not widely publicized, obviously, because there is a belief on the part of some people in authority that the public health benefits of vaccination outweigh the private harms to the thousands of people who are harmed every year. And when you realize that vaccination is basically experimental, you come to the conclusion that that’s wrong public policy.


Ms. Fucetola: And since the number of people who are damaged is growing every year, as we see more and more vaccinations, that amount of money is simply not going to cut it; it’s not going to be able to cover everyone.


Ms. Edwards:  Well, doesn’t it give the public a clue that nobody will even insure against damages?  Isn’t that a big neon sign, a billboard, that says, “Don’t do this!”?

You know, I’ve seen articles from doctors—pediatricians—that are against this across-the-board vaccinations. In California, it was a law for a while that newborns must have hepatitis shots. Now, it wasn’t—


Mr. Fucetola: Right.


Ms. Fucetola:  Yeah, yeah, they’re going to go running out having unprotected sex and dealing in drugs at what, two months?! (Laughs)


Ms. Edwards:  Well, I could see it if the mother was a drug user, or something, but in my daughter’s case they gave the baby the hepatitis shot the day she was born, didn’t ask, just said, “It’s the law!”


Mr. Fucetola: Ridiculous.


Ms. Edwards:  And we can trace her autism back to parts of that, because it made her allergic to the milk protein. It’s incredible. These people who passed the laws--why don’t we put their kids up first?


Ms. Fucetola: Well, I watched as the President took his smallpox shot and I thought, ‘Gee, that might cause brain damage,’ and then I said, ‘Nah!’


(All laugh)


Ms. Edwards:  ‘Course that was an awful thing for me to say, about putting their kids up for vaccinations. You know, they say it’s an acceptable risk, and again, it’s something my husband said, “In our generation, when we took our shots in the fifties, you rarely heard of a reaction,” and now the statistics are like, 1in 57—I had heard at this conference in Pittsburgh—another one was like, 2 in 80.  They come down with serious, serious complications: brain damage, autism, the site becomes rotted, a limb has to be amputated.  It’s INCREDIBLE when you look at these pictures of what’s happening with these kids, and these parents are just going through Hell!


Ms. Fucetola: Yeah, what’s really incredible, given these numbers and given the reactions of parents and the results and the things that are happening, is that the government is still pushing these things. You know, are they there to protect us or to harm us? I’m beginning to wonder what their purpose is in this.


Ms. Edwards:  Every day—there’s a front page article today—our local county health department, have rolled up their sleeve and there they are in the paper getting their inoculations, in case there is a bio-terrorism attack of Anthrax.  I hope that every body would have in a little emergency kit a little tone box that had the antidote to this on it. If we had enough money to distribute those to every household nobody would have to worry about whether or not we’re going to have Anthrax or smallpox. There wouldn’t be all these side effects!


Mr. Fucetola: Well, Sharry, if anyone is interested in contacting you on that, let me once again tell them that your website is, and also they can reach your website through the Byte show website.


Ms. Fucetola:  One thing here I’d like to mention, because Sharry was talking about people having tone boxes, is Sharry mentioned this a little bit before: the importance of analog versus digital sound. There are people out there who have, I guess, very few scruples, who claim to do sound work and they will sell you CDs with so-called “healing frequencies” on them. Well, we don’t describe anything as “healing”, we simply talk about energy that’s missing from the body that we try to replace in these experiments and this research we’re doing, but these people claim to have CDs that will give you the frequencies you need. The fact is it’s very difficult for the brain to decipher Frequency EquivalentsTM that come across on CDs, the brain just doesn’t pick it up—


Ms. Edwards: It’s because some harmonics are missing.


Ms. Fucetola: —and so you’re wasting your money if you buy an alleged CD that is supposed to do something with sound frequency, you’re just not going to get anything for your money. So don’t do it. If you are interested in BioAcousticsTM and in working with sound, make sure the practitioner, or the person you’re working with, is working with analog sound only. Okay? That was just something I had to throw in there, Sharry.


Ms. Edwards: For our Internet site, they could even do


Mr. Fucetola: Hey, you know, Sharry, we talked a little earlier about the award you received in October of 2002.  I want to take a moment or two and let people know about the honor you received in 2001 when the International Association of New Science, that’s IANS—and they can be found, by the way, at —gave you their “Scientist of the Year” award, and that award is granted to people who are chosen for their dedication, innovation, and leadership in a field of study, and the award said that “Edwards pioneered the field of BioAcousticsTM, which utilizes voice spectral analysis and the use of low frequency analog sound presentation to promote wellness.” I think that it’s important for people to understand that the technologies that you’ve been talking about this evening are technologies that are becoming widely recognized. They are, of course, a research modality at the present time, but it’s a research modality that’s rapidly moving into the mainstream.



This has been Ralph Fucetola and Kathy Fucetola standing in for GeorgeAnn Hughes on the Byte Show, cybercast every Friday, midnight Eastern Standard Time.  Please check the show website at for details. We’d like to thank GeorgeAnn and Cartagio, for giving us access to Internet Radio for this interview. By the way, my website is


Tonight’s guest was Sharry Edwards, you can link to her through the show website “Guests” section or through


Thank you all, and remember: Only Love Prevails; and have a safe, healthy, and joyful week.


Thank you, Sharry Edwards!


Ms. Edwards: You’re most welcome!


ã 2003 The Byte Show, posted with permission. v03/13/03, rev. 06/02/03

Sound Health Research Institute, Inc.